One of the new blogs I've begun reading regularly is Fernando Gros. He has been posting a series on his experiences of baptist ecclesiology: 1, 2, 3, 4. In the second post he suggests that many of his fellow ministerial students were 'Baptists-by-chance, rather than Baptists-by-choice'. I wonder if this reflects most people who belong to a baptist church. He says also that 'it was quite obvious that for most of my contemporaries, being Baptist was secondary or even inconsequential to their theological and ecclesiological identity.' I find this interesting, it is certainly my experience. Baptist identity is given scant regard by many, either through ignorance or indifference. Which is interesting when attention to baptist history, thought and identity has perhaps never been higher. I've moved form being a baptist-by-chance to being a baptist-by-choice. This does not mean I am not uncritical about baptist theology and ecclesiology, but that it identifies what church should and could be. Fernando says he is going to blog at some point about the baptist ideal versus the baptist reality, which should be good.
Recent Comments