Three years ago we celebrated the 200th anniversary of the
abolition of the transatlantic slave trade. The Christian contribution to this
was rightly acknowledged. Most Baptists would know the name of the British MP, William
Wilberforce. Many British Baptists would also know the name of William Knibb,
the BMS Missionary who came (eventually) to support the cause of emancipation
in Jamaica. However, I suspect that few Baptists in this country know the name,
much less the story, of Samuel ‘Daddy’ Sharpe.
He was a slave in Jamaica, and a leader in the native
Baptist church, who, along with others, planned a peaceful protest, a
work-stoppage at Christmas 1831, in the light of their reading of Scripture and
hoped-for liberation. This strike became an armed uprising, which resulted in
religious persecution, and ultimately the execution of Sam Sharpe and three
hundred others in the central square of Montego Bay. It is acknowledged that
this so-called ‘Baptist War’ was a catalyst for change in Jamaica, which is why
he is today recognised as an official National Hero of the country.
This conference on the ‘Context, Theology and Legacy for
Today’ of ‘Sam Sharpe and the Quest for Liberation’ brought together scholars
and church leaders from Jamaica, the USA, and the UK to reflect on the history
and historical context of Sharpe, and just as importantly the struggle for
liberation today. The senior leaders of BUGB, BMS, JBU (Jamaican Baptist
Union), and BWA were all in attendance which made it a significant event in Baptist
relationships. I went to the conference with an academic interest in slavery
and the Bible. I fully expected the usual scholarly discourse. I came away,
however, having been profoundly and deeply challenged.
It is perhaps the first time in my life that I’ve felt
uncomfortable being white (I don’t mean simply intellectually). I only wish
that I’d felt it sooner, because perhaps I would then have better understood
what it means to be black. Because one of the unexpressed themes that ran
through the conference was this: while I
relate to Sharpe on the level of his faith, many of the Jamaicans and Black
British relate to him on the level of his blackness. The consequence of this is
that his story can be appropriated as part of a theology of black liberation.
When we heard accounts of some sections of the black population in Britain
today, and the unlevel playing field they face, it was evident how necessary
this is.
The plenary session was particularly challenging, and of the
questions asked, one in particular will stay with me long after the conference:
whether, in the light of black theology, theology now needs to resource an approach
to white hegemony – in other words, what does theology have to say to whites
like me about our privileged status (whether we acknowledge this or not), and
what we should do about it? Apart from the obvious answer that theology should
have something to say, it was
appropriately left for us to consider. And it was particularly poignant that we
should go straight from the plenary to the after-hours session in which we
heard readings from Daddy Sharpe
by Fred Kennedy. This is a fictional narrative created around the actual
accounts of Sharpe’s life and death, and an excellent read. Hearing the
plausible prison dialogue between British missionary Henry Bleby as he visited
Sam Sharpe prior to his execution, was a very moving experience. The former,
with his ‘correct’ English accent, and the latter in his Jamaican tongue, says,
‘The only way to save your eternal soul, Sam, is to beg forgiveness for your
sin.’ ‘What sin, Sir?’ ‘The sin of inciting others to rebellion.’ ‘If I have
done wrong in that, I trust that I shall be forgiven, for I cast myself upon
the atonement’(1). The latter is taken from Bleby’s actual account of his
visit(2). In this, Sam Sharpe surely identifies both the theological hope for
black liberation, and the theological challenge to white hegemony.
The conference itself came out of the ongoing dialogue
following BUGB’s apology to the JBU over the transatlantic slave trade and all
that stemmed from it. I wrote a short article in the recent Baptist Minister’s
Journal (April 2010) in support of the apology. However, I realise now that I did not say
enough. Both in light of the tensions surrounding the apology at the time, and
the ongoing black struggle, the apology was not just a good idea, but a gospel
imperative. But, as the BUGB statement puts it, ‘we are only at the start of
the journey’(3). This conference certainly marked a milestone on that journey,
and due thanks should be accorded to the organisers’ at BUGB, BMS, and Regent’s
Park College for their willingness to take up the challenge. If this has been
typical of the steps along the way, it bodes well for the road ahead.
(2) Henry Bleby, Death Struggles of Slavery, 3rd edn. (London: Hamilton, Adams and Co., 1868): 130. Available as a free download from Google Books.
(3) www.baptist.org.uk/news_media/latest_news/slave-trade.html
Recent Comments