This year's Assembly was in Blackpool. It was, as expected, a mixed-bag. Craig Gardiner's Whitley Lecture was excellent, as was John Colwell's George Beasley-Murray Lecture (I'll blog some more on these later). It was good meeting new people and catching up with old friends - this seems to be the best reason for going to Assembly. I made it to the Regent's Park College reunion.
My main issues with Assembly are the main sessions. There are the special moments where we recognise new ministers and we remember those who have died. The worship is largely untrinitarian - what the theologian Sallie McFague has called 'jesusoltary' - and has no real space for confession, intercession or lament and more concerning no reading of scripture (this, which seems the common practice today, was tacked onto the beginning of the talk, rather than, being able to stand alone). You come away thinking as Baptists surely we can do better! We have see Gathering for Worship - which I think was only used during communion. Extemporary prayer is important part of Baptist spirituality and worship, but there is also a need for the crafted and thought about prayer. Perhaps the most shocking moment was when we say 'These are the Days of Elijah' despite John Weaver raising some questions about the song during his talk. (Others who hoped we wouldn't sing it, must have been happy!!)
I had a fair number of comments that went along the lines 'Andy Goodliff, I read your blog', which makes me wonder, if they read the paragraph above. what their feelings are with regards the state of Baptist worship at Assembly. I'm probably too harsh. I'm looking forward to hearing the thoughts of other bloggers.
Catriona has posted here and here, Geoff here.
Until next year, which will be in Bournemouth.
Hi Andy,
sorry, never did spot you at Assembly. Yup, I was well not pleased to sing that song!
I fully share your thoughts over the unitarian (small 'u', Jesus=God type) worship style and lack of scripture readings. I think Assembly is probably a place where 'prepared extempore' prayer by people who actually know how to craft prayers should be employed. For me one of the best worship moments was the silence in the closing all age bit - if children and babies (apart from the one who was crying) can do and value silence then why not adults?
Anyway, I'll keep reading if you keep posting. :o)
Posted by: Catriona | May 06, 2008 at 08:03 AM
I too am very concerned about the lack of Scripture reading. I commented to the organising committee last year. I felt there was more scripture this year but not as you rightly say in a stand alone context. It makes me wonder what we are afraid of. I also felt there was one meeting where there were no bible passages at all even though there was a sermon. In one of my sermon classes taken by Paul Fiddes I was rightly brought up short over the lack scripture and it has stuck with me since.
Thanks for blogging
Posted by: Richard | May 06, 2008 at 11:19 AM
Hi Andy - good to have a brief chance to chat at weekend. I'm with you on the subject of worship. It must be possible for us to develop a distinctly baptist way of conducting public worship in large scale celebrations; which integrate music, Scripture, liturgy, prayer (particularly confession and intercession) and visual arts (dance, drama, vt, etc).
Taking assembly as a whole I'm sure that among those who attend there is a wealth of talent and ability that is not being used. Yet if we could find ways of doing so, assembly would be a much richer experience.
Posted by: Neil | May 06, 2008 at 12:00 PM
I really noticed the lack of public reading of scripture. I thought the worship band was much better than in recent years but as you say the choice of songs wasn't the greatest. But it is the content of the rest of the main sessions, not the singing, that seems to be devoid of anything creative or spiritual. Though actually you don't need to be that creative to include some public reading of the bible, prayers, drama etc. But there was nothing of that. At times, it was like being at a political party conference, rather than amongst God's people gathered for worship.
Posted by: Tim | May 06, 2008 at 12:17 PM
Totally agree with your comments on the main Sessions. The absence of any reading of Scripture was noticeable and the prayers rarely got beyond 'me and God'.
I also thought the music was too loud - but I am now of that age!
I thought too that the planning of the programme left a lot to be desired. Is there nowhere in the country with a conference centre that could accommodate all the seminars and fringe meetings in one central location?
But it was good to meet friends and colleagues.
Posted by: Alan Mair | May 06, 2008 at 12:25 PM
Hi Andy.
Good to meet you (in the bar one night). Clearly with something like the Assembly you're not going to please everyone. Or, as is likely, anyone. For myself, i found some bits helpful and some less so, but overall i grew in my relationship with God and with other people. So i will give it a thumbs up.
Posted by: Iain | May 06, 2008 at 02:53 PM
Good to meet you briefly, Andy.
Enjoyed most aspects of the Assembly (including a good seminar on supporting local schools) and the opportunity to meet and catch up with others from the Baptist family. Two worship-related items I picked up on: firstly, I thought the Sunday am Communion lacked any real intercessory prayer which made it feel too inward-looking. Did I miss something? Secondly, am I right in thinking the only really strong element of lament in worship was actually during the final Family Celebration when we sang a song called 'Why'?
As for 'These are the days of Elijah' I think the worship leader did his best to explain the eschatological tension of the author's intention.
Posted by: Andy Scott | May 06, 2008 at 03:12 PM
I only have time for a really quick comment now, but I wonder if any of those who were hoping for something more creative attended Prism at all?
The only "main" session (and there's a discussion to be had about that phrase..) I was able to attend was the all-age, which I confess I loved.
Posted by: Jonathan | May 07, 2008 at 12:12 PM
In answer to Jonathan's comment, I went to Prism on the Saturday morning, in order to hear Vinoth Ramachandra, and wasn't disappointed. My only negative comment about Prism that morning was that we were surrounded by the detrius of other people's leftover breakfast, which wasn't conducive to the atmosphere.
Overall, I enjoyed the Assembly, but there were a number of niggling issues - some because of the venue and others regarding the 'main sessions', as mentioned by folks above.
Posted by: David Lewis | May 07, 2008 at 06:13 PM
Hi this was my first assembly and it was an intresting experience, i really enjoyed the prism programme and the more intimate nature of it.
I was disappointed that there was only one seminar relevant to youth and children's when this is suppose to be a focus for BUGB at the moment, as for the venues they were miles away and not within walking distance which meant taking a car not very green for an assembly which focused on climate change issues.
Having said all that i will be going again because i meet some great people there!
Posted by: Jennie Dobson | May 08, 2008 at 09:26 AM
Hi Andy,
I've never enjoyed the Assembly when I've been. But, reading some of these comments, I do wonder if we're too hard on it. I don't think we can really expect it to be all things to all people.
If it is to reflect the worship of the union, then it seems to me that it does a fairly good job - for better or worse.
Incidentally, I've always found Sallie McFague' phrase troublesome, blasphemous even.
Posted by: graham | May 09, 2008 at 12:54 AM
Graham
Why have you found McFague's phrase troublesome (do you know where she says it?)
Perhaps it does reflect the worship found in many of our churches, i just think it is an opportunity to example something better
Posted by: andy goodliff | May 10, 2008 at 10:12 AM
C.H.Spurgeon left the Baptist Union in 1887. I wonder why!!!
Posted by: Jonathan Castro | May 18, 2008 at 02:28 AM
Jonathan, there's no need to wonder. Spurgeon's reasons for leaving the BU at the time are very well documented. I can't quite see the relevance however.
Andy, if memory serves, the quote's from Models of God. I just don't see it as an appropriate or helpful phrase. I've been to very, very few churches (Baptist or otherwise) that I think place too much emphasis on Jesus. Obviously, there's lots of singing about it and a great deal of talk about his death, but I wouldn't often use the word Christocentric to describe churches I've encountered.
Moreover, if Jesus is what God looks like, I'm not at all sure that it's possible to be guilty of jesusoltary.
Posted by: graham | May 21, 2008 at 04:54 PM