The post below is my contribution to the
deep church website. I'd be interested in any comments, which you can make at
deep church site.
Philip Pullman, the children’s author and atheist, known most famously for his trilogy His Dark Materials (1995-2000) where he attacks and seeks to undermine Christianity, says in a recent essay:
‘We need a myth, we need a story, because it’s no good persuading
people to commit themselves to an idea on the grounds that it’s
reasonable. How much effect would the Bible have had for generations
and generations if it had just been a collection of laws and
genealogies? What seized the mind and captured the heart were the
stories it contains.’
I believe Pullman is correct. He is aware that if we reject, say
the Christian story, we need to replace it with something equally
powerful: we need a story in which we can orient our life and answer
the big questions. Where I disagree with Pullman is instead of
rejecting the Christian story, I believe we need to tell the story
better. Richard Hays has remarked,
'I have grown increasingly convinced that the struggles of the
church in our time are a result of its losing touch with its own gospel
story. We have gotten "off message" and therefore lost our way in a
culture that tells us many other stories about who we are and where our
hope lies. In both the evangelical and the liberal wings of
Protestantism, there is too much emphasis on individual
faith-experience and not enough grounding in our theological discourse
in the story of Jesus Christ.' (The Faith of Jesus Christ, 2nd Ed., 2001, lii)
Pullman, in His Dark Materials (HDM), is reacting against
the Western description of God as an authoritarian power, which I think
he is justified in doing. I have no problems with Pullman killing off
this god. In fact it clears the way for us to introduce the triune God
of the gospel, who's power is displayed on a cross. We also see in HDM
that Pullman's understanding of the Christian story is centred on
heaven and hell. Colin Gunton has said '‘[the Enlightenment’s] view of
traditional Christianity as authoritarian and excessively other-worldly was not entirely a caricature’ (Enlightenment and Alienation, 1985, 1).
But the Christian story we find in the New Testament is not centred on
the individual's eternal destination, but in the person's participation
in the divine drama of the triune God.
It is God’s story that the gospel tells and only secondly of our
involvement. It’s a story that subverts and reveals the emptiness of
all other stories. This is a story that we can orientate people
towards in their search for identity, which is grounded not in fantasy
but in truth and a truth that is not firstly scientific and detached,
but is personal and christological, that is, Jesus Christ is the Truth
(Jn 14:6) or ‘. . . no one can lay any foundation other than the one
already laid, which is Jesus Christ’ (1 Cor. 3:11). Because this truth
is christological it is also relational. The gospel is not a doctrinal
basis to which people sign up to, but is the Spirit liberating us
through Christ into relationship with the Father.
Sadly Hauerwas is right when he says, 'God has entrusted us, God's
church, with the best story in the world. With great ingenuity we have
managed to make the story, with the aid of much theory, boring has
hell.' We need to find new ways to tell the story of Jesus, to show
that it is alive and kicking, to show that it is world-altering and
life-changing - it might mean we have to change. This I think is what deep church is all about.
Recent Comments