Brodie's blog on kids @ church has got me thinking on the question on the place of children in the church. This is something I'm always wondering about and thinking how we can better relate children and church together. I worry sometimes that there can be something almost anti-thetical about the two.
So some thoughts on children and church:
1. Children, church and integration. There needs to be greater integration. In 2003 there was a series on channel 4 called Conversations with Rowan Williams. In 'The end of childhood?', the Archbishop of Canterbury discussed with Philip Pullman and Camila Batmanghelidjh, the topic of childhood. Philip Pullman said during the discussion 'the more intergenerational talking we have, the better we'll all be.' This is spot on. Church should be a place where children are integrated into the whole life of the church, not something that happens apart from it. Colin Gunton made an argument for infant baptism based on the fact that baptism is the way of entry into the church, in other words, we should regard our children as full members of the body. Although I am a Baptist, I like this argument, because it recognises that our children are part of the body of Christ: they are integrated and incorporated into the family of God. The church should not be a community of adults, but the whole people of God - one family - joined together by Christ in the Spirit. (As Baptists we might want to say it's a community of believers - this does not I think exclude children, alhough in my experience sometimes it does!)
2. Children are a gift. We need to recognise and affirm that our children are a gift and not a 'right'. There can be, in some areas of our churches, the belief that children are disruptive to worship. They make inappropriate noises, they find it hard to sit still, they have poor bladder control. This kind of belief forgets that children are a gift from the God to the church (because the church is the first family), who should be welcomed and afforded the grace to be 'children'. We need to ask the questions, 'what gift/s do our children give us?' - the joy of life, a model of trust, a desire to learn, hope - and 'what gift can we given them?' - patience, time, an ability to listen, to share our lives, something to learn. The gift of children from God is the sure hope that God is looking after our world. I want to add also here that children don't have to wait until they're 18 for God to use them - scripture is full of examples of children being part of God's plan (for example, the boy who remembered his lunch at the feeding of the 5,000).
3. Children need models. Children need to see the Christian life embodied, they need to see how it works. They need to witness forgiveness, truthfulness, patience, courage, non-violence, gentleness, kindness, love in action. Children need to learn how to pray, to worship, to live faithfully. I reject the notion that there is a latent spirituality within us that just needs to be awakened. Faith does not lie hidden within us, it is a gift from God; the practice of forgiveness is not something that only needs to be teased out of us, it is a gift from God who forgives us in Christ, which needs to be received and learned. This is why 'children's church' is not the best place for our children; they need to see discipleship lived and breathed. I'm not saying that children should not have special time to be together as children to learn about God and grow in faith, but to recognise that there needs to be more to the experience of faith than 'sunday school'. Children need to see the witness of those who have followed God for many years - here is the vital role of elderly (see more thoughts on this here).
4. Church does not equal entertainment. Too often we think the way to relate children and church together is through entertainment. Our emphasis is on entertaining our children rather than discipling them. My concern here, is one day they will grow out of being entertained, and perhaps grow out of following Jesus. Children and church should not be how can we fill the time and keep them occupied, but how can we teach and provide opportunities to try on this Christian identity. What I am not saying, is children should not have fun, instead we need to ensure against church becoming the equivalent to baby-sitting. We should encourage our children to play and experience Christianity in all its fullness and diversity.
5. Children, church and storytelling. We need to tell children stories: stories of God - many stories, the entire breadth of scripture - and stories of the church. They need to see that the God of creation, of Israel and of Jesus is the God of the church - the same yesterday, today and forever. They need to hear the big giant story of God and the smaller stories of Abraham, Moses, David, Paul, etc. Our children should not be short-changed, that is, we shouldn't avoid the difficult bits of the Old Testament and the strong words of Jesus. They need to hear happy stories and sad stories - recognising that God is present in every circumstance of life. They need to see that the church is still part of God's story; that it is God's story and not ours. He is the Narrator and principal Actor and we have walk-on parts to play.
6. Children, church and participation. Our children, and this is related to integration, need to participate in worship - they need to be active and not passive. Children shouldn't be onlookers, but at the heart of the church's worshipping life. We need to think how can we see our children participate in the eucharist, in our prayers, in welcoming and blessing, in our reading of the Word. In every ingredient of our worship, lets consider the place and participation of our children. Here I think we can try and be more multi-sensory in our worship, engaging all the senses, not just our eyes and ears.
7. Children, church and hospitality. Rodney Clapp writes, in Families at the Crossroads (1993), that 'children are strangers' and so in need of our hospitality. He says there are four ways our children are strangers: (1) They comes to us as aliens and have to learn to live in our world; (2) Our children are also strangers to us because we are strangers to ourselves (that is, we don't recognise the habits children learn are learnt from us!); (3) Children exist in relation to God and not simply ourselves; and (4) In a culture afraid to admit dependence, children unashamedly confess their need for others. In welcoming our children, we are welcoming strangers and learning the art of hospitality (see my post on hospitality here). Children should feel welcomed and valued in the church; they should feel listened to and encouraged; they should be cared for and challenged. Are we hospitable towards our children?
A lot of good challenges thrown out here, Andy. I think often we don't recognise children's ability to hear God- just like Eli initiallly didn't recognise Samuel's ability. By our attitudes we can make children think- "but I am just a child" like Jeremiah did.
A lot of the time children's heads are a lot more uncluttered by inhibitions and limitations, which makes hearing God much easier...
In terms of modelling, I do think that seeing faith in action is essential, but isn't that a truism across the board; church meeting are not the fullness of discipleship for any of us. Sunday school can be a brilliant part of encouraging and building up the faith of a child; it certainly did that for me. However, even now I would be daft to expect my discipling to come from a Sunday meeting. We do all need to live the life together.
Posted by: Mim | April 26, 2005 at 09:59 PM
Andy - great post, as always you're way more articulate than I am. A couple of thoughts spring to mind. One is that how we view children in the church often has it's roots in how we view / treat children in the family setting. Thus if we are to gather as a "family" on a Sunday, the "change" most probably needs to have stared in the home. Are we teaching our children to worship, pray, read and listen to scripture in these settings? Are we in the home giving them the tools to help them understand their faith and how to apply it? It we are not doing it here then we've little hope of making a difference on a Sunday. As a father of 3, I'm pointing the finger at myself as much as anyone else.
Secondly I think Jesus was serious when he said, "suffer" the children to come unto me. As you rightly say this requires a shift in mindset at church from "what do I get from this", to "what can I give".
Posted by: Brodie | April 27, 2005 at 11:32 AM
As others have mentioned, some great thoughts.
When I was in my field education parish in seminary, I asked my mentor what his theory was about youth ministry, and he said he didn't have one. At first, I thought he was lazy or unreflective, but as I grew I think I learned that there was wisdom here.
On the other hand, there is a local church which has a special center for children with a ball pit and a big screen television. (This same church doesn't have any crosses up anywhere, so it gives you an idea of where they're coming from.) The children are not at all incorporated into worship.
I think the wisdom of my supervisor (and the utter folly of this particular local church) is that the worship of the church is for everyone, which is a rather countercultural stance. So much of the rest of our world ensures that people (families included) are separated from each other based on marketing criteria, and formed into consuming individuals, rather than a body of people. I tend to cringe at a great deal of what passes for "children's liturgy" (which is, after all, just another form of marketing division), and yet I feel passionate that children are to be included. At our parish, we do not do anything that would seem child-oriented, but we encourage children to participate as much as possible, and we expect everyone to be hospitable to them -- and we have a growing population of children.
I've rambled on a bit here, but I look forward to hearing more.
JF
Posted by: Jason | April 27, 2005 at 11:17 PM
Thanks for all your comments. Mim, you are right in saying (and maybe I need to clarify myself more cleary) that children have just an ability (and maybe even more so) to hear God than an adult.
Brodie, your link between church setting and family setting is spot on - there's a lot that needs to be said - in brief, I think the "family unit" often is in tension with the church, and I think theologically this is problematic, the task of family and the vocation of the family I think needs to be placed more in the context of the whole church.
Jason, some interesting comments - you say "you encourage children to participate and for everyone to be hospitable towards them" - I'm interested if this actually happens and what is it that causes it to happen?
Posted by: andy goodliff | May 03, 2005 at 06:35 PM
Thanks - very helpful!
Posted by: Pete | May 04, 2005 at 09:41 AM
Andy:
I think it does indeed happen here, children participating and being present in church, although of course not without bumps. Part of it happens by example: when there are a number of families with children who are used to being in worship present, then it provides an example to other families, that this is possible and OK. It also provides an example to other people without children that kids may be part of the service. Another way we encourage this is by public statements to that effect: the rector is quite clear that we want children to learn to worship with the community from day one. (We do have a nursery available, and if children are being fussy or having a bad day or whatever, they may take advantage of it -- but it is not usually very heavily populated.) A further way that they are allowed to be in worship os that we don't necessarily expect them to, say, engage in the sermon the same way an adult might. They are allowed to color, read a book, play with quiet toys, etc. in the pews during many parts of the service. We have learned that this is fine and that they still pick up a great deal, benefitting from being present rather than being sequestered somewhere else. (We have church school between services, not during them.) To encourage this quiet, creative play, we also have available at the back of the church cloth drawstring bags with children's names on them, containing a couple of coloring books, crayons and whatnot; there are several labelled "visitor", too.
Of course, we also know (as one other person mentioned) that supportive activities must take place in the home, too. My daughter (3 y.o.) knows the words to and sings the Gloria during the service -- I believe she can do this because I often sing a setting of the Gloria to her when I am putting her to bed at night. Yesterday, she prayed to God for "love and peace", and again I imagine that a large part of that is hearing my wife and I pray for such things.
Finally, I think part of including children at St. Paul's might involve an educational philosophy. Our church school here, from age three through high school, is based on a Montessori philosophy. (Our daughter and a several other children also attend a local Montessori school.) I don't know as much about the philosophy as I ought, but I have seen that it encourages children to take responsibility for themselves, it respects them as people (and children) and involves them actively in relationships of reciprocity with others, including adults. They are not expected to be adults, but to be children, formed in certain ways. (This ties in with your more recent post.)
Anyway, that is some idea of how it works around here.
Cheers,
Posted by: Jason | May 06, 2005 at 03:28 PM
"There can be, in some areas of our churches, the belief that children are disruptive to worship. They make inappropriate noises, they find it hard to sit still, they have poor bladder control."
I thought you might appreciate a slightly different angle here. I attend Quaker meetings. These are silent affairs, just the sort of place where children can make a lot of noise and cause a lot of disruption. To a small child, a room full of silent adults is the perfect opportunity to hear your own voice or experiment with what kind of noises you can make with your body and some do take the opportunity! Other times, I've seen sibling fights break out in the middle of the silence.
Children don't usually stay in meeting for the whole time - they are usually taken out into a sort of Quaker version of Sunday school. In some meetings they come in about 15 minutes before the end, running along the floor like a herd of miniature elephants, clambouring over the chairs or benches and leaping on to their parents knees to show them their latest piece of art work!
I'm sure there are times when this can be quite irritating and disruptive, but I love these little moments, the life and enthusiasm that children bring to the silence is something that enriches my experience of it.
I love this little extract from Quaker Faith and Practice:
"At meeting for worship relax and let your baby be with you; my small daughter called it `the best cuddle of the week' when I couldn't rush off and do something busy. It's not easy for the parents to believe that their child's gurglings actually help the meeting rather than interrupt it. Nonetheless, that is true, and you shouldn't give way to the temptation to take a happily babbling child out of the meeting (though howling is something different!)."
Anne Hosking,1986 (Quaker Faith and Practice - British Yearly Meeting)
Posted by: ruthie | May 16, 2005 at 12:12 PM
I have enjoyed reading your comments. I am in the process of writing a research paper on this topic for a class I am taking. That's how I ran across this website. Does anyone know where I could find a good history of children's church? I didn't have one and I grew up in the 60-70's. So it would seem to be a fairly new thing. Sunday School, they say, started in the 1870's, and some believe Children's church is an outgrowth of the bus movement. "What to do with all those kids coming who are not coming with a family." Would appreciate any help you all could give me.
Thnaks
Posted by: Pati Heller | November 05, 2005 at 02:24 PM